Crescent Vale Self-Graded Scores
Crescent Vale Self-Graded Overall Score: Copy 1 an 8.5 and Copy 2 a 9.
Grok AI Scores
- Overall Appearance: Clean, centered image with good pop. The red holographic background shows nice light reflection and depth.
- Corners: Appear sharp and intact under the available lighting. No visible chipping, dings, or soft spots from this angle.
- Edges: Clean white borders visible on the sides. The red foil border looks consistent without major nicks or dents.
- Surface: The foil and holographic elements show strong reflectivity. No obvious scratches, scuffs, or print defects on the player image or nameplate. The “OBSIDIAN MAGNITUDE” text has a nice metallic sheen.
- Centering: Front appears well-centered both left/right and top/bottom based on the framing.
Grok AI Overall Score: 9.5 Mint+
Estimated Grade Range (PSA/BGS): Likely PSA 9 or BGS 9.5 potential, pending closer inspection for micro-surface imperfections or slight edge wear not fully visible in photos. Strong candidate for a Gem Mint if it passes blacklight and loupe checks.Copy 2 (Right Card)
- Overall Appearance: Very similar visual appeal to Copy 1, with vibrant red holographic background and crisp player cutout.
- Corners: Sharp and pointed. Slight variation in light reflection compared to Copy 1, but no obvious damage.
- Edges: Similar clean appearance. The red border foil reflects light with a slightly different angle in some shots, but no visible damage.
- Surface: Holographic elements pop similarly. The basketball and uniform details are clear. No major print lines, scratches, or whitening visible.
- Centering: Also appears well-centered, possibly nearly identical to Copy 1.
Estimated Grade Range (PSA/BGS): Also in the PSA 9 to Gem Mint 10 or BGS 9.5 range. The two cards look extremely close in quality from the provided angles.Side-by-Side Comparison & Key ObservationsThe two cards are nearly identical in quality. Key differences are minimal and mostly due to lighting/angle in the photos rather than actual card condition:
- Surface Reflectivity: Both show excellent holographic “rainbow” sheen on the red background. Copy 2 (right) catches light with slightly more purple/blue shift in some areas, but this is normal for these parallels.
- Corners & Edges: Both look factory-fresh with no whitening, dents, or chipping visible.
- Cut/Print Quality: The die-cut player image and black nameplate area are clean on both. The red foil border is consistent.
- Potential Subtle Differences:
- Copy 1 (left) might have a very minor surface anomaly or dust speck in one of the close-ups, but it’s hard to confirm without physical inspection.
- Copy 2 (right) appears marginally cleaner in some close-up shots of the lower portion.
Close-Up Details (Corners, Edges, Surface) Notes from close-ups:
- The red foil has that characteristic Obsidian “prismatic” look with strong light play.
- Corners look 4-sharp on both (no soft corners visible).
- Edges show no obvious chipping or roughness.
- Surface on the holographic areas is smooth; the player photo cutout is crisp with no bubbling or lifting.
- Minor specks/dust visible in some photos are likely on the protective sleeve or surface, not the card itself.
Back of the Cards (for Reference)The backs confirm these are 2021-22 Panini Obsidian Basketball cards (No. 5 in the set for Cade Cunningham). Standard Obsidian design with Panini branding.Final Grading Recommendation (as PSA/BGS Grader)Copy 1 (Left): PSA 9.5 / BGS 9.5 (very strong Gem Mint candidate)
Copy 2 (Right): PSA 9.5 / BGS 9.5 (equally strong Gem Mint candidate)These two cards are extremely comparable in quality — essentially twins from a visual standpoint. Both have excellent eye appeal, sharp corners, clean surfaces, and good centering for this parallel. To reach a full PSA 10 or BGS Black Label 10, they would need to pass strict scrutiny for:Perfect 50/50 centering (front & back)
Zero micro-scratches under magnification
Flawless edges with no whitening
No print defects or foil inconsistencies
Recommendation: Both are high-end examples worth submitting to PSA or BGS. They look like they could grade 9.5 or 10 depending on the grader’s eye for these modern foil-heavy inserts. If you’re planning to slab them, I’d recommend BGS for the sub-grades (centering, corners, edges, surface) since these parallels are highly visual.
Please Note: This card is housed in a custom display slab for superior protection and presentation. While the label may include descriptive details, this is not a grade from a third-party professional service (such as PSA, BGS, or SGC). The card is being sold as Raw/Ungraded. Please review the high-resolution photos provided to make your own assessment of the card’s condition before bidding or purchasing.
