• Centering: 9.5 – Left/right ≈ 50/50–55/45; top/bottom ≈ 55/45. Borders are balanced with no noticeable tilt or framing issues.
• Corners: 8 – Three corners are sharp with only microscopic whitening. The bottom-right corner shows a very slight soft tip and a trace of white core (visible in the extreme close-up). 
• Edges: 9 – Clean cuts with no chipping, nicks, or color loss along the black scoreboard bar, gold banner, or purple borders.
• Surface: 9.5 – High gloss retained, gold foil starburst and lettering intact and free of scratches or rub, blue splatters and purple field clean under magnification, no print defects or roller marks. Back is clean yellow stock with full gloss and no wear on the rules text or logos.

Card 215 (right) Grok AI overall grade: 9.5 (Mint)

• Centering: 9.5 – Virtually identical to 214 (left/right ≈ 50/50–55/45; top/bottom ≈ 55/45).
• Corners: 9 – Extremely close to 214. Bottom corners again show the same microscopic soft tip/white-core exposure under extreme magnification; the other two corners remain razor-sharp.
• Edges: 9.5 – Identical clean presentation to 214; no chipping or fraying.
• Surface: 9.5 – Matching gloss, foil quality, and freedom from scratches or print issues. Back is equally clean.

Summary notes (PSA & BGS perspective)

• Both cards sit solidly in the Mint 9 range. The only factor preventing a 9.5/10 is the minor corner whitening visible only under high magnification on the bottom corners.
• Centering, edges, and surface are strong enough that a BGS 9.5 would be possible if the corners were a half-point cleaner.
• No surface scratches, print dots, or edge chipping of the type that would drop either card to an 8.5.
• Backs are problem-free on both (full color, no writing, no stains, hologram intact).

These are strong examples of the insert; the differences between 214 and 215 are negligible and would not affect market value or slab preference under either company.